<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Subtle Bluntness &#187; Den of Geek</title>
	<atom:link href="http://subtlebluntness.com/category/den-of-geek/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://subtlebluntness.com</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 30 Apr 2010 13:40:09 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
			<item>
		<title>My Date Night With Tina Fey</title>
		<link>http://subtlebluntness.com/2010/04/13/my-date-night-with-tina-fey/</link>
		<comments>http://subtlebluntness.com/2010/04/13/my-date-night-with-tina-fey/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 13 Apr 2010 13:55:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Ron</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Action]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Comedy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Den of Geek]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Movies]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Shameless Self Promotion]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[action comedies]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[date night]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[movie reviews]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[steve carell]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[tina fey]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://subtlebluntness.com/?p=1060</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I saw and reviewed Date Night the other night for Den of Geek, and I have to say something about Tina Fey.  While I go back and forth on just how funny I think she is, there&#8217;s one thing about her I can&#8217;t deny.  She&#8217;s adorable.  With glasses or without (but definitely with) her glasses, [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I <a href="http://denofgeek.com/movies/461259/date_night_review.html" target="_blank">saw and reviewed <em>Date Night</em></a> the other night for Den of Geek, and I have to say something about Tina Fey.  While I go back and forth on just how funny I think she is, there&#8217;s one thing about her I can&#8217;t deny.  She&#8217;s adorable.  With glasses or without (but definitely with) her glasses, she&#8217;s just&#8230; I don&#8217;t know, cute?  Can you describe a 40-year-old woman as cute?</p>
<p>Either way, I have a new candidate to become my millionaire girlfriend or the latest in my long line of celebrity ex-wives.</p>
<p><a href="http://subtlebluntness.com/2010/04/13/my-date-night-with-tina-fey/"><em>Click here to view the embedded video.</em></a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://subtlebluntness.com/2010/04/13/my-date-night-with-tina-fey/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Back To The Hot Tub Hangover Machine In The Future</title>
		<link>http://subtlebluntness.com/2010/03/29/back-to-the-hot-tub-hangover-machine-in-the-future/</link>
		<comments>http://subtlebluntness.com/2010/03/29/back-to-the-hot-tub-hangover-machine-in-the-future/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 29 Mar 2010 20:24:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Ron</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Comedy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Den of Geek]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Movies]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Reviews]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Sci-Fi]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Shameless Self Promotion]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[comedies]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[craig robinson is in everything]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[craig robinson is the best part of every movie he's in]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[crispin glover]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[hot tub time machine]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[john cusack]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[movie reviews]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[time travel comedy]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://subtlebluntness.com/?p=1054</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[It&#8217;s hard to review a comedy.  I mean, I can eyeball a horror movie or a sci-fi thriller or an action flick and say, &#8220;Yes, this is good,&#8221; or &#8220;No, this isn&#8217;t good,&#8221; pretty easily, even if it&#8217;s not my particular taste.  There&#8217;s nothing tougher to review than a comedy.  What I find funny, you [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It&#8217;s hard to review a comedy.  I mean, I can eyeball a horror movie or a sci-fi thriller or an action flick and say, &#8220;Yes, this is good,&#8221; or &#8220;No, this isn&#8217;t good,&#8221; pretty easily, even if it&#8217;s not my particular taste.  There&#8217;s nothing tougher to review than a comedy.  What I find funny, you might think is terrible, and vice versa.  The easiest way to review a comedy is to compare it to another comedy, and as I mention in <a href="http://denofgeek.com/movies/comments/450655/hot_tub_time_machine_review.html" target="_blank">my review of <em>Hot Tub Time Machine</em></a>, the only thing you can really compare it to are non-Judd Apatow dude comedies like <em>Old School</em> and <em>The Hangover</em>.</p>
<p>So, long story short, if you liked those two movies, or you like Craig Robinson in any of his 20 or so memorable roles this year from <em>Miss March</em> to <em>Pineapple Express</em> and <em>Zack and Miri Make A Porno</em>, then you&#8217;ll like this movie.  Also, John Cusack fans will probably enjoy it, too.  Apparently there are a lot of those.</p>
<p>Author&#8217;s note:  Crispin Glover has now been in two movies where he&#8217;s played the same character 20 years apart.  First George McFly in Back to the Future and now again as Phil the bellhop, 1986 and 2010 versions.  He now joins Tim &#8220;Ted the Bellhop&#8221; Roth and Jerry Lewis in the pantheon of great movie bellhops.  Just some trivia for you.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://subtlebluntness.com/2010/03/29/back-to-the-hot-tub-hangover-machine-in-the-future/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>2</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Repo Men, AKA Good Actors In Bad Movies</title>
		<link>http://subtlebluntness.com/2010/03/24/repo-men-aka-good-actors-in-bad-movies/</link>
		<comments>http://subtlebluntness.com/2010/03/24/repo-men-aka-good-actors-in-bad-movies/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 24 Mar 2010 19:34:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Ron</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Action]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Den of Geek]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Movies]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Sci-Fi]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Shameless Self Promotion]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[action movies]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[forest whitaker]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[jude law]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[movie reviews]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[repo men]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[sci-fi movies]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://subtlebluntness.com/?p=1050</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Well, I got a chance to go check out Repo Men, the latest in a long line of sci-fi action thrillers with a better concept than execution.  I mean, the idea of a future where artificial organs can be repossessed when you don&#8217;t pay your bills isn&#8217;t a far-out concept.  We&#8217;re pretty close to that [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Well, I got a chance to go check out <a href="http://www.imdb.com/title/tt1053424/" target="_blank"><em>Repo Men</em></a>, the latest in a long line of sci-fi action thrillers with a better concept than execution.  I mean, the idea of a future where artificial organs can be repossessed when you don&#8217;t pay your bills isn&#8217;t a far-out concept.  We&#8217;re pretty close to that now thanks to high medical bills and whatnot.</p>
<p>Unfortunately, <a href="http://denofgeek.com/movies/444698/repo_men_review.html" target="_blank">the movie is actually pretty terrible</a>.  It&#8217;s kind of an anti-<a href="http://subtlebluntness.com/2010/03/01/cop-out-the-crazies-and-m/" target="_blank"><em>The Crazies</em></a> in the respect that it&#8217;s taking from great source movies, but doesn&#8217;t do anything with it.  Even more damning, it&#8217;s got some really good actors in the lead roles.  In particular, Forest Whitaker gives a great performance that&#8217;s absolutely wasted on some really terrible material.</p>
<p>I don&#8217;t get it.  Why would a good actor sign on for a bad movie?  Did he not know the script was bad when he signed on?  Did they kill it with editing (not possible since the movie is still 2 hours long) and rewrites?  Did he just need the money?</p>
<p>There&#8217;s nothing sadder than a good actor in a terrible film, giving us his all with shitty material.  I mean, if it&#8217;s a choice between Forest working and Forest not working, I&#8217;d rather see him than not see him.  Still, he could do better than this.  There&#8217;s no reason for him not to be doing better roles, aside from his weight (he looks much slimmer now than he has previously).</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://subtlebluntness.com/2010/03/24/repo-men-aka-good-actors-in-bad-movies/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Dawn of the Dreadfuls</title>
		<link>http://subtlebluntness.com/2010/03/03/dawn-of-the-dreadful/</link>
		<comments>http://subtlebluntness.com/2010/03/03/dawn-of-the-dreadful/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 03 Mar 2010 15:22:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Ron</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Comedy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Den of Geek]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[PopFi]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Reviews]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Shameless Self Promotion]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Zombies]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[books]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[dawn of the dreadfuls]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[free stuff]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[giveaways]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[pride and prejudice and zombies]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[quirk books]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[shameless promotion of others]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[steve hockensmith]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://subtlebluntness.com/?p=1039</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[After having sat on the review for an entire week, today is the release date for my Pride and Prejudice and Zombies: Dawn of the Dreadfuls review.  It&#8217;s about time March 3 got here, because I&#8217;ve been going nuts talking the book up in private but without any recourse to spew my review upon the [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>After having sat on the review for an entire week, today is the release date for my <a href="http://denofgeek.com/comics/431675/pride_and_prejudice_and_zombies_dawn_of_the_dreadfuls_book_review.html" target="_blank">Pride and Prejudice and Zombies: Dawn of the Dreadfuls review</a>.  It&#8217;s about time March 3 got here, because I&#8217;ve been going nuts talking the book up in private but without any recourse to spew my review upon the reading public.  Now it&#8217;s out there, and I feel much better.</p>
<p>I got the book pretty quickly after I was approved for the blog program, which was impressive in and of itself.  More impressive was the fact that I basically picked up the book one day, randomly, and had my review finished by that same time the next day.  I tore through the book like a zombie at a meat processing plant.  It really is a great, funny read if you know anything about Victorian England.</p>
<p>Perhaps more importantly, you can win a free copy of the book and a bunch of other stuff.  <a href="http://quirkclassics.com/index.php?q=QuirkClassicsContest_DOD_Reviews" target="_blank">Just head over to Quirk&#8217;s forum, sign up and register (I know it&#8217;s a bitch, but there&#8217;s like $100 worth of freebies up for grabs for 50 people) and let them know where you saw it.</a> Either here, PopFi, or DoG works, since Quirk knows they&#8217;re all me.  Make me look good, readership.  If you somehow don&#8217;t manage to win, you can just <a href="http://www.amazon.com/gp/product/1594744548?ie=UTF8&amp;tag=subtlblunt-20&amp;linkCode=as2&amp;camp=1789&amp;creative=390957&amp;creativeASIN=1594744548" target="_blank">buy the book for $8.73 at Amazon</a> (or 80 cents if you use a Kindle).  It&#8217;s definitely worth the purchase.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://subtlebluntness.com/2010/03/03/dawn-of-the-dreadful/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>3</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Cop Out, The Crazies, And Me.</title>
		<link>http://subtlebluntness.com/2010/03/01/cop-out-the-crazies-and-m/</link>
		<comments>http://subtlebluntness.com/2010/03/01/cop-out-the-crazies-and-m/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 01 Mar 2010 18:06:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Ron</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Action]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Comedy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Den of Geek]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Movies]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Reviews]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Shameless Self Promotion]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Zombies]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[action comedy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[action movies]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[comedy movies]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[cop out]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Kevin Smith]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[movie reviews]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[remakes]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[the crazies]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://subtlebluntness.com/?p=1033</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[So I saw Cop Out, and I&#8217;m in the minority since I actually enjoyed the movie.  For me, it works as a direct homage to those 80&#8242;s buddy cop movies, before they got all worn out by overuse.  Most people apparently didn&#8217;t dig it, but I liked it and apparently the audience did too, since [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>So I saw Cop Out, and I&#8217;m in the minority since <a href="http://denofgeek.com/movies/430647/cop_out_review.html" target="_blank">I actually enjoyed the movie</a>.  For me, it works as a direct homage to those 80&#8242;s buddy cop movies, before they got all worn out by overuse.  Most people apparently didn&#8217;t dig it, but I liked it and apparently the audience did too, since it was second in <a href="http://denofgeek.com/movies/430649/weekend_us_box_office_report_shutter_island_tops_kevin_smiths_best_opening_ever.html" target="_blank">the top 10 this weekend</a>.</p>
<p>I also managed to get out and see The Crazies, the 2010 Breck Eisner remake of the 1973 George Romero virus panic horror flick, except this time The Crazies are basically zombies, and the Romero framework is used to support a greatest-hits of postmodern zombie movies.  <a href="http://denofgeek.com/movies/430646/the_crazies_review.html" target="_blank">I also enjoyed it</a>, and it seems more people enjoyed it than did Cop Out, at least in terms of critical indices and whatnot.  Not like I care what critics say, but it&#8217;s nice to know I&#8217;m not the only person out there in the wilderness, screeching at the top of my lungs that a movie is adequately entertaining.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://subtlebluntness.com/2010/03/01/cop-out-the-crazies-and-m/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>3</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>The Warcraft Movie</title>
		<link>http://subtlebluntness.com/2010/02/23/the-warcraft-movi/</link>
		<comments>http://subtlebluntness.com/2010/02/23/the-warcraft-movi/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 23 Feb 2010 14:31:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Ron</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Den of Geek]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Movies]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Shameless Self Promotion]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Sam Raimi]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[wish lists]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[world of warcraft]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[WoW]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[WoW movie]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://subtlebluntness.com/?p=1027</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[So, I&#8217;ve resigned myself to the fact that there&#8217;s going to be a big-screen World of Warcraft movie.  There&#8217;s no sense fighting it.  It&#8217;s not in developmental hell, Sam Raimi is producing it as we speak, and Robert &#8220;Saving Private Ryan&#8221; Rodat is hard at work on the script.  Just accept it; this thing is [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>So, I&#8217;ve resigned myself to the fact that there&#8217;s going to be a big-screen World of Warcraft movie.  There&#8217;s no sense fighting it.  It&#8217;s not in developmental hell, Sam Raimi is producing it as we speak, and Robert &#8220;Saving Private Ryan&#8221; Rodat is hard at work on the script.  Just accept it; this thing is going to happen because they&#8217;ve already pumped a bunch of money into it.</p>
<p>Fortunately, we&#8217;re not so far into production that I can&#8217;t offer my suggestions to all involved.  Here are the <a href="http://denofgeek.com/movies/420601/10_things_i_want_from_the_world_of_warcraft_movie.html" target="_blank">10 things I want from the World of Warcraft movie</a>.  Why 10?  Because people love lists of things in nice, round numbers, and there&#8217;s nothing rounder than 10, except maybe 8.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://subtlebluntness.com/2010/02/23/the-warcraft-movi/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>3</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>A &#8220;From Paris With Love&#8221; Review From Ron With Love</title>
		<link>http://subtlebluntness.com/2010/02/08/a-from-paris-with-love-review-from-ron-with-love/</link>
		<comments>http://subtlebluntness.com/2010/02/08/a-from-paris-with-love-review-from-ron-with-love/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 08 Feb 2010 20:53:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Ron</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Action]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Comedy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Den of Geek]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Movies]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Shameless Self Promotion]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[action movies]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[camp besson]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[from paris with love]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[john travolta]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[luc besson]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[movie reviews]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[pierre morel]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[taken]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://subtlebluntness.com/?p=1014</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[So, Pierre Morel is really making a play to break out of Luc Besson&#8217;s shadow, at least in terms of directorial skill.  I mean, he&#8217;s still working in Camp Besson, but he&#8217;s at least in charge of the productions, rather than just the cinematographer.  District B13 was awesome, Taken was way awesome, and the verdict [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>So, Pierre Morel is really making a play to break out of Luc Besson&#8217;s shadow, at least in terms of directorial skill.  I mean, he&#8217;s still working in Camp Besson, but he&#8217;s at least in charge of the productions, rather than just the cinematographer.  <em>District B13</em> was awesome, <em>Taken</em> was way awesome, and <a href="http://www.denofgeek.com/movies/412177/from_paris_with_love_review.html" target="_blank">the verdict for <em>From Paris With Love</em></a>, at least from me, is fairly awesome.</p>
<p>It&#8217;s not novel like <em>B13</em>, or as well done and tense as <em>Taken</em>, but it&#8217;s still a really fun action movie and worth checking out if you like European action flicks, John Travolta, or lots of people getting shot in Paris.  As I described the movie in my Den of Geek review, &#8220;<span class="bodycontents">It&#8217;s like <em>The Odd Couple</em>, but one of them kills dozens of people!</span>&#8221;</p>
<p>Wouldn&#8217;t Camp Besson be the real most magical place on earth?  I mean, you run from explosions down a hallway, you shoot down dozens of people in cold blood, you have ripping action sequences and car chases, and you&#8217;re generally the most awesome guy around.  There&#8217;s no way I wouldn&#8217;t go to Camp Besson every summer for a refresher course in ass-kickery.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://subtlebluntness.com/2010/02/08/a-from-paris-with-love-review-from-ron-with-love/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>May Flights Of Angels Machine Gun Thy To Thy Rest</title>
		<link>http://subtlebluntness.com/2010/01/28/may-flights-of-angels-machine-gun-thy-to-thy-rest/</link>
		<comments>http://subtlebluntness.com/2010/01/28/may-flights-of-angels-machine-gun-thy-to-thy-rest/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 28 Jan 2010 18:36:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Ron</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Action]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Den of Geek]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Movies]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Reviews]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Shameless Self Promotion]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Zombies]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[action movies]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[angels with machine guns]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[future Rifftrax]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Legion]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[movie reviews]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Paul Bettany]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://subtlebluntness.com/?p=1010</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I reviewed Legion over at Den of Geek.  Look on these works, ye Paul Bettany fans, and despair.  Also, there&#8217;s Charles S. Dutton and Dennis Quaid, so despair a little extra for those two. Yes, I know I just mixed Shakespeare&#8217;s Hamlet with Shelley&#8217;s Ozymandias.  I did that in much the same way Legion mixes [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I <a href="http://www.denofgeek.com/movies/404020/legion_review.html" target="_blank">reviewed Legion</a> over at <a href="http://denofgeek.com" target="_blank">Den of Geek</a>.  Look on these works, ye Paul Bettany fans, and despair.  Also, there&#8217;s Charles S. Dutton and Dennis Quaid, so despair a little extra for those two.</p>
<p>Yes, I know I just mixed Shakespeare&#8217;s <em>Hamlet </em>with Shelley&#8217;s <em>Ozymandias</em>.  I did that in much the same way Legion mixes The Bible, action movies, zombies, and ham-fisted CGI:  deliberately and with malice aforethought.  It&#8217;s not that <em>Legion </em>is bad, it&#8217;s just that <em>Legion </em>is incredibly dumb.  I have no doubt that it&#8217;ll make a great Rifftrax one day.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://subtlebluntness.com/2010/01/28/may-flights-of-angels-machine-gun-thy-to-thy-rest/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Denzel is the coolest man at the end of the world</title>
		<link>http://subtlebluntness.com/2010/01/21/denzel-is-the-coolest-man-at-the-end-of-the-world/</link>
		<comments>http://subtlebluntness.com/2010/01/21/denzel-is-the-coolest-man-at-the-end-of-the-world/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 21 Jan 2010 15:09:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Ron</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Action]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Den of Geek]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Movies]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Reviews]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Shameless Self Promotion]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Denzel Washington]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[movie reviews]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[post-apocalyptic movies]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The Book of Eli]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://subtlebluntness.com/?p=1008</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[When I was at the coffee shop the other day, I was talking about movies.  (What, me?  Talk about movies?  Never!)  I forget how I got on this subject, but eventually it all came around to The Book of Eli.  I mentioned that I reviewed it for Den of Geek and mentioned how, five years [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>When I was at the coffee shop the other day, I was <a href="http://www.denofgeek.com/movies/399700/weekend_us_box_office_report_avatar_nears_500_million_the_book_of_eli_is_a_best_seller.html" target="_blank">talking about movies</a>.  (What, me?  Talk about movies?  Never!)  I forget how I got on this subject, but eventually it all came around to The Book of Eli.  I mentioned that <a href="http://www.denofgeek.com/movies/399699/the_book_of_eli_review.html" target="_blank">I reviewed it for Den of Geek</a> and mentioned how, five years ago, it&#8217;d be a Wesley Snipes movie.  And it&#8217;s true.  I mentioned that in my review, as well.  (I also called the movie Mad Blax, as in the blaxploitation Mad Max, even if the movie and character of Eli are colorblind.)</p>
<p>Either way, I think pretty much any B-quality movie (which Eli is just because of its setting) can be improved with the presence of quality actors who are willing to slum it a little.  Hence Denzel as Eli.  Gary Oldman, while a fine actor, is always willing to slum it in a B-style movie (see his long history of working with Luc Besson), so he doesn&#8217;t count for this discussion.  His style of villain is always appreciated.</p>
<p>This topic smells like an article idea, so if you have any good suggestions for A-list actors in B-movie roles, please suggest them below.  I could use some help on this one from the collective Internet Braintrust.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://subtlebluntness.com/2010/01/21/denzel-is-the-coolest-man-at-the-end-of-the-world/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>3</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>10 in 2010 Trollgasm</title>
		<link>http://subtlebluntness.com/2010/01/15/10-in-2010-trollgas/</link>
		<comments>http://subtlebluntness.com/2010/01/15/10-in-2010-trollgas/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 15 Jan 2010 21:28:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Ron</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Blog Business]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Den of Geek]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Movies]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Shameless Self Promotion]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[10 movies to look forward to in 2010]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[clients for the derek zoolander center for kids who can't read good and who want to learn to do other stuff good too]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[lists]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[new releases]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[notable movies in 2010]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[people who can't read]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[trolls]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://subtlebluntness.com/?p=1006</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[There&#8217;s just something about a list that makes people virulent.  Take, for example, my list of 10 big films to watch out for in 2010.  On the surface, if you actually READ the entries, you&#8217;ll see that these aren&#8217;t all guaranteed to be good.  However, they *might* be good and even if they&#8217;re not, they [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>There&#8217;s just something about a list that makes people virulent.  Take, for example, my list of <a href="http://denofgeek.com/movies/397888/10_big_films_to_watch_out_for_in_2010.html" target="_blank">10 big films to watch out for in 2010</a>.  On the surface, if you actually READ the entries, you&#8217;ll see that these aren&#8217;t all guaranteed to be good.  However, they *might* be good and even if they&#8217;re not, they will be much talked about.  Tell that to the trolls who lack reading comprehension skills.</p>
<p>For the most part, my list seems to get approval.  Some people don&#8217;t like the inclusion of B movies like Machete and The Expendables; that&#8217;s fine.  They&#8217;re mostly respectful.  Some people are angry that I left off movies that come out in 2011.  That&#8217;s fine too; it&#8217;s not my fault you can&#8217;t read or do simple Google-based reasearch.  Some people think my selection of an 11th movie, The Twilight Saga: Eclipse, is stupid.  I guess they didn&#8217;t read the part where I talked about how excited I am by the chance to slag off yet another Turdlight film.  That&#8217;s fine, I can&#8217;t force people to get sarcasm, and DoG hasn&#8217;t paid up to buy <a href="http://www.popfi.com/2010/01/14/a-sarcasm-punctuation-mark-thats-useful/" target="_blank">the Sarcasm Mark</a> yet.</p>
<p>However, one common thread is that people are livid about two movies:  Alice in Wonderland and Robin Hood.</p>
<p>When it comes to <em>Alice</em>, I kind of understand.  People (geeks) are sick of Johnny Depp prancing around in an incredibly gay costume.  I get that.  People are also sick of Tim Burton selling them a bill of goods, then delivering another half-baked shit brownie of a movie.  I get that, too.  But the outright hate is kind of mystifying.  Doesn&#8217;t he still have moments of occasional brilliance, even in his lowest moments?  Well, not <em>Planet of the Apes</em> low, but <em>Sweeny Todd</em> wasn&#8217;t all bad and <em>Charlie and the Chocolate Factory</em> had its moments!  Hell, I threw the caveat right there in the description!  &#8220;<span class="bodycontents">Despite being burned by Burton&#8217;s last few films, it&#8217;s hard not to be taken in by the chance that this sequel to <em>Alice In Wonderland </em>recaptures the laudanum dreamscape of Burton&#8217;s classic films.</span>&#8220;  Plus, the script is out of his hands and is in the hands of someone who has won a Best Picture (Linda Woolverton), so hopefully it&#8217;ll be better than his normal product.</p>
<p>And the other object of hate?  <em>Robin Hood</em> has been done to death; I get that.  People are letting Russell Crowe&#8217;s personal life and temper detract from their enjoyment of his acting work; I get that too.  But are people really not familiar with Ridley Scott?  I mean, does the fact that he made <em>Alien </em>make a difference?  OR that <em>Gladiator </em>was actually a really good movie in spite of the hype?  <em>Blade Runner</em>?  <em>Legend</em>?  Am I wrong in saying this could be the best version of Robin Hood&#8217;s tired story since the Disney cartoon?  I threw a caveat on this one too, saying its quality would depend largely on Brian Helgeland&#8217;s script (he did both LA Confidential and The Postman, so it&#8217;s a crapshoot [literally]).</p>
<p>But no, I don&#8217;t want to see them remake <em>Clash of the Titans</em> and ruin it with computers when they&#8217;re doing better stop motion now than they ever have.  No, I don&#8217;t give a crap about <em>Prince of Persia</em>.  And no, I&#8217;m not terribly excited by <em>Scott Pilgrim Vs. The World</em>, if only because I&#8217;m kind of sick of Michael Cera and am totally unfamilar with the source material.  I can&#8217;t even get credit for the 8 good movies I did pick versus the toss-ups I included and the exercise in masochism I added.</p>
<p>But hey, fuck me for having some uncharacteristic optimism, right?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://subtlebluntness.com/2010/01/15/10-in-2010-trollgas/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>5</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

